

AI in Legal
by Maarten Mortier, Head of AI & innovation at Henchman
AI and legal tech have come a long way, but let’s keep it real. AI is a fascinating field full of endless possibilities, but it’s not all unicorns and rainbows. As we are tracking a technology readiness curve, you can think of AI as a tech journey with its fair share of peak-of-expectation highs and valley-of-disillusionment lows. While some AI technologies have reached a plateau of commonplace, such as OCR for document scanning, others like text generation or even legal text translation still need a human touch to crack their domain-specific complexities.
Meet Maarten, passionate about coding and delivering beautiful, simple solutions to customers. As the Head of Innovation & AI at Henchman, Maarten tries to enrich the lives of lawyers with AI and pushes its boundaries even further. With a useful background as a CTO-turned-Product-&-Tech Advisor for startups, scale-ups (CTO at Showpad, In the Pocket, ..), and investment funds (Miles Ahead, Green Park, ..), Maarten tries to marry product needs with the possibilities offered by technology. Often, this marriage takes a bit of honeymooning to get to the right plateau of productivity.
As an illustration of the technology path of AI, Maarten draws inspiration from an MIT report on autonomous driving and its application to legal tech automation. He proposes using a structured framework of levels to navigate the diverse landscape of AI in the legal field. Starting from the fundamentals of document management and search capabilities, progressing through semantic searches, semi-autonomous assistance, domain-specific automation, and ambitiously striving for fully autonomous workflows, each level represents progress in leveraging technology to enhance legal processes.
Taking it one step at a time is crucial, while recognizing the value provided by intermediate solutions. While generative models like GPT and its chat-based or other API-based interfaces hold great potential, they can also be prone to generating inaccurate or hallucinatory information. Careful consideration is necessary to ensure that legal concepts, integrity, and accuracy are maintained when leveraging these tools.
Those with proficient prompting skills may gain an advantage over others
As we enter this exciting era of AI and legal technology, those with proficient prompting skills may gain an advantage in accessing relevant information efficiently. However, it is essential to acknowledge that relying solely on these tools may still be limited to certain cases. A cautious and informed approach that combines human expertise with AI capabilities will pave the way for a more peaceful and productive integration of technology in the legal field.
Remember, the ultimate goal is not just the moonshot of fully autonomous systems, but also the tangible value created through each step of the automation journey. By leveraging AI in a domain-specific manner and continuously evolving our understanding of its capabilities, we can navigate the complexities of AI in legal tech and harness its true potential to empower and enhance the work of lawyers.
testimonials